Confidence Estimation for English Word Typing by Using a Key-Logger
Journal
電子情報通信学会技術研究報告パターン認識メディア理解研究会
Presentation number
PRMU2017
Pages
pp.1-6
Number of pages
6
Location
青山学院大学 青山キャンパス
Reviewed
Not reviewed
Date
March 2018
Research fields
Pattern recognition
Key
Maruichi2018_PRMU (id=1604)
Abstract
Reviewing plays an important role in English vocabulary acquisition. However, we tend to overlook the words that were correctly answered without confident. In this research, we estimate confidence in answering
English word typing questions to let learners reviewing more effectively. We use keystroke information acquired
by a key-logger to estimate the confidence. In order to evaluate the proposed method, we employed the dataset
obtained from 12 participants answering 120 questions. From the experimental results on estimating the confidence,
the proposed method has achieved the average accuracy of 91.3% in the case of user-dependent learning, and 89.8%
in the case of user-independent learning.
Files
…
Export this publication
Tab-separated. Paste into the sheet starting at column A. Required fields that cannot be inferred are left blank.
Format definition
Edits apply immediately and stay in effect until you pick a style again or reset. First line is the default; add lines like "book: …" to override per type.
How to write the definition
Insert a field with braces like {authors}. A part enclosed in [ ... ] is omitted entirely when any field inside it is empty. Available fields:
One macro per line as \name{field}{field}…. A field name in braces is replaced by its (LaTeX-escaped) value; other text is kept. Rename macros or add lines freely — they appear in the macro selector. A line like master_thesis: thesis fixes the macro for a type (automatic choice: journals use paperdoi with a DOI, paperno with a number, else paper; conferences conf with pages, else confpaper; books book). {pages} comes as 119--124; {journal} falls back to the book title. Fields: