Tree-based machine learning model integrating clinical table data and chest x-ray images to predict prognosis of covid-19 patients
| Language | Japanese |
|---|---|
| Type | Proceedings of Japanese Conferences |
| Authors | Hina Kotoura, Kohei Yamamoto, Koki Horikawa, Ryohei Takamoto, Yuta Nonomiya, Yuichiro Iwashita, Kaori Kuriu, Shoya Ishimaru, Soichiro Nakako, Hiroshi Okamura, Masakazu Iwamura, Koichi Kise, Ayumi Shintani |
| Title | Tree-based machine learning model integrating clinical table data and chest x-ray images to predict prognosis of covid-19 patients |
| Journal | Proceedings of the 43rd Joint Conference on Medical Informatics (the 24th conference of the Japan Association for Medical Informatics) |
| Presentation number | 4-G-4-03 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Publisher | 日本医療情報学会 |
| Location | 神戸ファッションマート |
| Reviewed | Reviewed |
| Presentation type | Oral |
| Date | November 2023 |
| URL | https://confit.atlas.jp/guide/event/jcmi2023/subject/4-G-4-03/entries |
| Key | Kotoura2023 (id=1942) |
Abstract
Background: Since the peak number of COVID-19 mortality in Japan tends to increase with each outbreak, it is important to identify patients at high risk of death at an early stage. In a previous study, a neural network model was simultaneously trained with clinical and imaging information to predict the prognosis of COVID-19 patients. On the other hand, it has been reported that tree-based models outperform neural networks for table data. We aimed to construct and evaluate a tree-based prognostic model that treats chest X-ray images in the same way as other clinical information by reducing them to one dimension using neural networks. Methods: This study used the Stony Brook University COVID-19 dataset of 1313 inpatients. In order to predict mortality of all patients, we developed a model (hereafter referred to as “proposed model”) with LightGBM trained with the clinical table data combined with the result of prediction of a model with DenseNet trained with chest radio graphs. We also developed a model with LightGBM trained with the clinical data alone and a model with DenseNet trained with images. Results: The f1 scores for the proposed model, the table data-only model, and the image-only model were 0.59, 0.58, and 0.25, respectively. The ROC-AUC for the proposed model, the table data-only model, and the image-only model were 0.91, 0.93, and 0.63, respectively. Image prediction had the highest variable importance in the proposed model. Conclusion: the proposed model achieved high prediction accuracy. It was suggested that clinical table data contributed more to than chest X-ray images. On the other hand, images may improve prediction accuracy when combined with clinical table data.
Export this publication
Format definition
How to write the definition
Insert a field with braces like {authors}. A part enclosed in [ ... ] is omitted entirely when any field inside it is empty. Available fields:
{authors}{authors_and}{authors_ja}{authors_ja_tight}{authors_en}{authors_en_and}{authors_tight}{first_author}{title}{title_ja}{title_en}{journal}{journal_ja}{journal_en}{book_title}{volume}{number}{series}{presen_id}{pages}{pp}{num_pages}{year}{month}{month_en}{month_short}{ym}{date}{date_ja}{date_en}{publisher}{address}{location}{review}{review_ja}{review_en}{reviewed_mark}{presen_type}{type}{type_label}{doi}{url}{key}{awards}