Wearables have seen an increase in popularity as the technology has advanced. Via physiological sensing, these devices allow individuals to easily monitor their daily health, but there are limitations in real-world implementation. One limitation is the ability of end users to properly gauge how well a device fits. Proper fit is often crucial for accurate data collection, as ill-fitting devices can result in poor performance. In this work, we examine the fit of the ring sizes the participants chose at the start of the in-the-wild study and examine the effect it has on sensor data. An analysis of 38 participants shows that only every third participant chooses an optimal ring size. We show that this leads to reduced efficacy of the wearable.
Export this publication
Tab-separated. Paste into the sheet starting at column A. Required fields that cannot be inferred are left blank.
Format definition
Edits apply immediately and stay in effect until you pick a style again or reset. First line is the default; add lines like "book: …" to override per type.
How to write the definition
Insert a field with braces like {authors}. A part enclosed in [ ... ] is omitted entirely when any field inside it is empty. Available fields:
One macro per line as \name{field}{field}…. A field name in braces is replaced by its (LaTeX-escaped) value; other text is kept. Rename macros or add lines freely — they appear in the macro selector. A line like master_thesis: thesis fixes the macro for a type (automatic choice: journals use paperdoi with a DOI, paperno with a number, else paper; conferences conf with pages, else confpaper; books book). {pages} comes as 119--124; {journal} falls back to the book title. Fields: